Question 1 of 30
In a corporate environment, a company implements a role-based access control (RBAC) system to manage user permissions effectively. The organization has three roles: Administrator, Manager, and Employee. Each role has specific permissions associated with it. The Administrator role can create, read, update, and delete resources, while the Manager role can read and update resources but cannot delete them. The Employee role can only read resources. If a new employee is hired and assigned the Manager role, what would be the implications for resource management and security within the organization, considering the principle of least privilege and potential risks associated with role escalation?
The Manager role allows the new employee to update resources, which aligns with the principle of least privilege, ensuring they have only the necessary permissions for their job function.
The Manager role grants the new employee excessive permissions, potentially leading to unauthorized changes to critical resources.
The principle of least privilege is violated since the Manager role should not have any update permissions.
The new employee will have the same permissions as an Administrator, which could lead to security vulnerabilities.

Preparing for VMWare 2V0-62.23 VMware Workspace ONE 22.X Professional? Now land the interview.

73% of qualified candidates get rejected because of weak resumes. Build an ATS-optimized, recruiter-ready resume in under 5 minutes - free to start.

Build My Resume Free