Globex Enterprises, a multinational corporation headquartered in Geneva, is implementing a new global information system to consolidate data from its various subsidiaries operating in countries using Cyrillic-based languages (Russia, Ukraine, Bulgaria, etc.). The CIO mandates the use of ISO 9:1995 for transliterating all Cyrillic data into Latin characters to ensure data consistency and interoperability across the organization. However, concerns arise from the marketing and legal departments. The marketing team argues that strict adherence to ISO 9:1995 will result in unfamiliar and potentially unrecognizable Latinized versions of brand names, hindering marketing efforts in international markets. The legal department worries about potential discrepancies between the ISO 9:1995 transliterations and existing legal documents and contracts that use established, albeit non-standard, Latinized versions of company names and place names. Furthermore, the IT department estimates that a complete and automated transliteration based on ISO 9:1995 could lead to data loss or corruption in some legacy databases due to character encoding issues and limitations in the existing software. Given these challenges, what is the most effective strategy for Globex Enterprises to balance the need for standardization with the practical requirements of different departments and the potential for data loss during the transliteration process, while adhering to ISO/IEC 27033-1:2015 principles for information security?