\"Global Infrastructure Partners\" (GIP), a multinational consortium, is undertaking a large-scale infrastructure project spanning several countries in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). The project documentation, including site surveys, environmental impact assessments, and engineering reports, requires extensive use of Arabic geographical terms. The project team comprises engineers, surveyors, and environmental scientists from various countries, including the United States, France, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia. To ensure clarity and consistency in the documentation, the project manager, Dr. Amina Khalil, decides to implement a standardized transliteration system based on ISO 233:1984. However, during the initial phase, discrepancies arise in the transliteration of place names, leading to confusion and potential errors. For example, the term \"وادي رم\" (Wadi Rum) is variably transliterated as \"Wādī Ramm,\" \"Wadi Rum,\" and \"Wadi Ram.\" Considering the diverse linguistic backgrounds of the team members and the need for accurate and consistent documentation, which of the following strategies would be the MOST effective in resolving these transliteration inconsistencies and ensuring compliance with ISO 233:1984 across the project?