\"Sentinel Security Solutions,\" a private security firm operating in a politically unstable region, has developed a comprehensive risk management policy aligned with ISO 18788:2015 and ISO 31000:2018. They have a designated risk manager, Anya Petrova, who conducts regular risk assessments and develops detailed risk treatment plans. However, during a recent internal audit, it was discovered that operational teams frequently deviate from the prescribed risk treatment plans due to perceived time constraints and operational pressures. Frontline security personnel often bypass established communication protocols for reporting near-miss incidents, and there is limited evidence of consistent monitoring of risk control measures at the operational level. Despite the existence of a risk register and documented procedures, the risk management framework appears to be disconnected from daily operations. A significant near-miss involving a vehicle convoy highlights a breakdown in adherence to established route risk assessments and emergency response protocols.\n\nIn light of these findings, what is the MOST appropriate immediate action for Sentinel Security Solutions to take to address this disconnect and ensure effective risk management implementation across all levels of the organization, aligning with the principles of ISO 18788:2015 and ISO 31000:2018?