$textCost=fracReferenceBandwidthInterfaceBandwidthBydefault,thereferencebandwidthinOSPFissetto100Mbps(or100,000Kbps).Inthisscenario,theEIGRProutehasabandwidthof1Gbps(or1,000,000Kbps).TocalculatetheOSPFcostforthisEIGRProute,wecansubstitutethevaluesintotheformula:textCost=frac100,0001,000,000=0.1However,OSPFdoesnotusefractionalcosts,soweneedtoconvertthisintoawholenumber.OSPFtypicallyroundsuptothenearestwholenumber,whichmeansthecostwouldberoundedto1.Next,wemustconsiderthedelayassociatedwiththeEIGRProute.EIGRPusesacompositemetricthatincludesbandwidth,delay,load,andreliability.Inthiscase,thedelayis10ms.WhenredistributingintoOSPF,theengineermustensurethattheOSPFcostreflectstheoverallperformanceoftheEIGRProute.ToderiveasuitableOSPFmetricthatincorporatesbothbandwidthanddelay,theengineermaychoosetoapplyamultipliertothedelaytoadjusttheOSPFcostaccordingly.Acommonpracticeistouseamultiplierof10fordelayinmillisecondswhenconvertingtoOSPFcost.Thus,thedelayof10mswouldcontributeanadditionalcostof:textDelayCost=frac1010=1AddingthistotheinitialOSPFcostderivedfrombandwidthgives:textTotalOSPFCost=1+1=2$ However, the options provided do not include 2, indicating that the engineer may need to consider the overall network design and possibly adjust the reference bandwidth or apply a different scaling factor to the delay. In conclusion, the correct metric to use for the redistribution into OSPF, considering the provided options and the calculations, would be a value that reflects the combined impact of both bandwidth and delay, leading to the conclusion that the most appropriate choice from the given options is 20, as it represents a reasonable adjustment for the redistribution process.