Correct answer
The route learned via EIGRP will be selected as the best route.
Next, we need to evaluate the metrics associated with each route. RIP uses hop count as its metric, which is straightforward but can lead to suboptimal routing in complex networks. In this case, RIP has a hop count of 4. OSPF, on the other hand, uses a cost metric based on bandwidth and other factors, and here it has a cost of 10. EIGRP utilizes a composite metric that considers bandwidth, delay, load, and reliability. In this scenario, EIGRP has a bandwidth of 1000 Kbps and a delay of 200 microseconds. To calculate the EIGRP metric, we can use the formula: $EIGRP,Metric=left(frac107Bandwidth+Delayright)times256Substitutingthevalues:EIGRP,Metric=left(frac1071000times103+200times10−6right)times256Calculatingthebandwidthcomponent:frac1071000times103=10Now,convertingthedelaytomilliseconds:200,mus=0.2,msThus,theEIGRPmetricbecomes:EIGRP,Metric=(10+0.2)times256=10.2times256=2611.2$ Now we compare the metrics: RIP (hop count of 4), OSPF (cost of 10), and EIGRP (calculated metric of 2611.2). Despite the EIGRP metric being higher, the administrative distance takes precedence in this scenario. Since EIGRP has the lowest AD (90), it will be selected as the best route to the destination network, regardless of the metric values. This highlights the importance of understanding both administrative distance and routing metrics in determining the best path in a routing table.